Document Type : Scientific-Research

Author

Associate Professor, Department of History, The University of Tehran, Iran

Abstract

No methodological polemic has taken shape among the advocates of history in Iran until now, for they have not had enough command of different methods, paradigms, and theories. After having command of different methods, it is necessary to engage gradually in methodological dialogues so that we will be able to move forward to test them in case studies to ascertain the weak and strong points of each methodological paradigm through the criteria of experience. Hence, this paper is an attempt to deal with the following methodological problem: What is the most crucial disciplinary task of the historians? The hypothesis of this research is as follows: The most crucial disciplinary task of historians is to provide a proper description of the past human events, for history’s power of knowledge lies in this very issue. Moreover, proper description follows answers to the questions on whatness (quiddity) and howness; questions in which the historians are keenly interested.

Keywords

 
List of sources with English handwriting
- Audio file of the scientific conference "The most important disciplinary task of historians" held at the Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran in the presence of Qobād Mansoūr Bakht, Alīrezā Mollāī Tavānī and Ḥassan Ḥażratī, published on the Telegram channel of the Faculty of Literature and Humanities at: t.me/literature_ut_ac
- Edvârdz Pol (1375), Falsafeye Târīḵ: Maĵmūʼe Maqâlât az Dâyeratolmaâref-e Falsafe, translator: Behzâd Sâlekī, Tehrân: paŽoūhešgāh ʼ Olum-e Ensânī va Moṭâl ʼeâte Farhangi. [In Persian]
- Hazrati ,Hasan (2011)," Ibn Funduq and Historical Studies ", Historical Sciences Studies, 3, No 1, [In Persian]
- Ḥażratī, Ḥasan (1388 Š.), "Darâmadī Bar Naqd-e Târīḵī", Ketâb-e Mâh (Târīḵ va Joġrâfīya), 140. [In Persian]
- Ḥażratī, Ḥasan (1392 Š.), " Tariḵšenâsī ve Moṭâlʼeat-e Mīyân rešteīī: Forsat  yâ Tahdīd?" Published in: Rahmânīyān Dâryūš (edt), Maĵmūʼe Maqâlat-e Hamâyeš-e Târīḵ va Hamkârī-hā-ye Mīyân rešteīī, Tehran: Pejuheškadeye Târi-e Eslâm. [In Persian]
- Ḥażratī, Ḥasan (1397 Š.), Raveše pežuheš dar Tarišenâsi, Qom: Logus, [In Persian]
- Ḥażratī, Ḥasan (1398 Š.), "Tarīḵnegārī-ye enqelâb-e eslâmī dar dâm-e avâmzadegī", Published in: Ḥażratī, Ḥasan(edt), Naqd-e Raveššenāsī-ye Tarīḵnegārī-ye enqelâb-e eslâmi (Collection of Papers), Tehrân: Pejuheškade-ye Imâm omeyni va Enqelâb-e Islâmī. [In Persian]
- Nâderī, Ahmad (1391), "Kliford Gertz, az Pozitivism tâ Ensânšenâsī-ye Tafsīrī", paŽoūheš-hā-ye Ensânšenasī-ye Irân, 2, No 1. [In Persian]
- Nowḍarī, HossienAlī (1387), Falsafeye Târīḵ, Raveššenâsī va Târīḵnegâ, Tehrân: Ṭarhe Noū. [In Persian]
- Ṭâleban, Mohammadrezā (1391), ĵostâr-hā -ye Raveši dar ʼOlūme Eĵtʼemâī, Tehrân: paŽoūheškade-ye Imâm omeīnī va Enqelâb-e Islâmi. [In Persian]
 English Source
- Boswell, Terry and Cliff Brown (1999) The Scope of General Theory: Methods for Linking Deductive and Inductive Comparative History , Sociological Methods & Research, 28 (2)
- Clark, Elizabeth (2004), History, theory, text: historians and the linguistic turn, Harvard University Press.
- Collingwood، Robin George (1956), The Idea of History, Oxford
- Foran, John (1992), Fragile resistance: Social transformation in Iran from 1500 to the revolution, Westview Press.
- Geertz, Clifford (2017), The Interpretation of Cultures , Basic Books.
- Lowith، Karl (1957), Meaning in History: The Theological Implications of the Philosophy of History, The University of Chicago Press.
- Mahoney, James & Gary Goertz (2006) A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative research, Political Analysis, 14 (3).
- Peel, J. D. Y. (1971), Herbert Spencer: The Evolution of a Sociologist, London. 
 - Spencer, H. (1904), An Autobiography, London.